Okay, so the utopian collectivist movement that I am starting on Substack, should I call it ‘Snarxism’ or ‘Snarksism’?? The slogan is “Smirkers of the world, unite!!”, which is awesome and cannot be challenged, but I’m torn on the spelling of Snarxism. Let me know.
Regardless, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, I am convinced that we can create an ideal society if we all join together and behave like obnoxious wise acres. What could go wrong?
One of the core beliefs of the dogshit Marxist human beings who currently support attempting to transform society into something that lacks consequences or standards, is that property damage is insignificant. We saw this during the Child Molester Riots™️ last year. I call them the Child Molester Riots™️ based on the peer reviewed Rittenhouse study. Granted, the Rittenhouse study only confirmed that 33% of them are child molesters, but close enough. BLM stands for “boys love molestation”. It does.
Anyways, these scumbags repeatedly said that property damage is not that consequential. A particularly weird claim from a group that is focused SOLEY on redistributing property. Please understand how dumb these assholes are. I’m looking at you Sideshow Bob….(Nicole Hannah Jones looks exactly like Sideshow Bob. Google it.)
It’s so retarded I truly can’t express it. People having unequal amounts of money is a war crime AND ALSO money isn’t important. Are you kidding me?? Find their fathers and castrate them. Let’s start with that and then move towards a more sensible policy.
All of this resulted in me discovering that you can’t defend your property with a gun. I actually thought you could. Apparently you can’t. You are allowed to defend yourself with deadly force if you reasonably fear great bodily injury, but you can’t defend your property at all. This is our law??
This is totally psychotic. Ask anyone with a small business if they would prefer having their entire business burn to the ground OR have their leg broken. It’s not even a close call. Broken leg every time. Recovering from a broken leg takes four months maybe? Meanwhile, you are looking at the possibility of losing your entire life’s work? Everything you’ve done in your life wiped out and you have to start over from nothing? That is such a worse hell than breaking your leg. It’s unbelievable that these are our laws.
If you storm into an antique shop in Portland with a can of gasoline and a lighter, I want the owner of the antique shop to be allowed to shoot you in the fucking forehead. Why? Because I’m a decent human being. That’s why. Nice bonus if it’s an antique gas can that says “Standard Oil” on the side………okay so it is important that this hypothetical rioter is not there to simply sell an antique gas can, and you need to reasonably fear otherwise before laser-dotting their forehead.
Please share this profanity-laced adolescent tirade with your loved ones.
Marry Christmas!!
Snarxism, most def. And the standard for use of legal force varies from state to state, with some states having statutes like "castle law" that extends the protection you enjoy in your home to your automobile. Other states have "stand your ground" laws where as long as you are telling people to back away deadly force is authorized. In New York, only criminals are allowed to carry weapons and a mild cough is reason enough to let them out of prison. Sometimes federalism seems like a barrier to common sense and good governance, but maybe that's just stupid voters.
Snarxism